The different approaches between native mobile application and web applications (HTML5): Stakes and Opportunities.
‘’Who’s afraid of native
mobile application development? I can safely say a lot of enterprises. Native
mobile application development has been branded as expensive, laborious and one
that might require re-skilling for different platforms like Android, iOS or
Windows, even as it is known to offer the best user experience and has the best
access to device features. Besides, native mobile applications typically result
in higher performance, while mobile applications that need to access hardware,
work best when developed on native platforms. Native mobile applications
are also most suited for instances when you have a set of specific users or
have set behavior patterns.
Despite its many benefits,
developers and even enterprises have gravitated towards web applications
(HTML5) or hybrid because they’re cost effective; they save time and are easier
and faster to develop. But most appealing is the fact that once developed on
web, these mobile applications can be deployed onto various devices. But truth
be told, web applications are not necessarily always successful and many
enterprises are often left to deal with failed applications.
However, recent trends are
showing that native mobile applications are slowly but surely shedding this
image (of being hard to develop) and enterprises and developers are looking at
them with renewed interest. In a recent research by IDC and Appcelerator, many in the developer community showed
dissatisfaction with the level of experience of web applications and were not
too happy with performance either. They were also unhappy with aspects like
monetization, fragmentation and security. However, they did show satisfaction
with the cross-development capabilities of HTML5, and features like immediate
updates.
While enterprises should adopt
a strategy that helps them best decide on the most apt platform based on
application need and user set, they definitely need to cast aside fears
surrounding native development for mobile applications, especially around lack
of skill or level of difficulty and cost. Developers can adopt cross-platform
skills and expertise fairly easily because at the heart of all native mobile
applications lies a common development paradigm; Module-View-Controller (MVC).
MVC is a common design pattern that runs across platforms. Once mastered, it
can easily be applied across platforms. Other features that run across
platforms include memory management, device orientation, and interaction with
voice call. Additionally, for developers, native platforms provide several
tools for screen design, unit test framework and ability to simulate hardware
features on development machines. Technology apart, it’s the knowledge gained
and the experience derived from mobile application development that can help
developers create application across multiple platforms.
Development costs can be a
deterrent for CIOs, but CIOs must also remember to find the right balance and
not trade it off for developing poor mobile applications that find few takers.
In the end, the true measure of success for mobility is the number of satisfied
consumers, using engaging and user-friendly applications. And these can be
developed on native platforms with higher rate of success.’’
